React
React development for complex browser interfaces and design systems.
Component architectures for product interfaces, operational tools, and maintainable UI systems.
Technology capabilities
How does AonHive choose a stack?
Technology stack and development expertise, chosen for the outcome, the constraints, and the team that will own the system. The technology is never the pitch.
Selected capability
React development for complex browser interfaces and design systems.
Component architectures for product interfaces, operational tools, and maintainable UI systems.
Next.js development for SEO-ready web products and content platforms.
Server-rendered applications with deliberate routing, caching, content, accessibility, and performance decisions.
Node.js development for APIs, integrations, and event-driven services.
Backend systems that connect product workflows, external services, queues, and operational data.
.NET development for enterprise applications and integration-heavy systems.
Modern .NET services and applications designed for clear boundaries, testability, and long-term ownership.
TypeScript development for typed product and integration work.
Shared types, safer refactors, and explicit contracts across web, mobile, and service boundaries.
Angular development for structured enterprise web applications.
Large-scale browser applications with typed templates, routing, and maintainable module boundaries.
Vue.js development for progressive web interfaces and product UIs.
Composable front-end systems where incremental adoption and clear component boundaries fit the product shape.
Java development for enterprise services and integration platforms.
Backend systems, APIs, and long-lived services built for reliability, observability, and team ownership.
Python development for APIs and data jobs that should not sit inside a click.
Typed request edges and workers for imports, reports, and model calls the user does not have to wait on.
PHP development for applications and integrations on a mature PHP stack.
A thin HTTP edge over domain services the web request and the queue worker both call.
Engineering choice
We make those consequences visible early, document the trade-offs, and revisit decisions when evidence changes.
The product journey, system constraints, existing estate, and team capability narrow the field before preference enters the discussion.
We consider how clearly the system can be tested, changed, debugged, documented, and handed to the people who will own it.
Identity, data boundaries, dependency posture, update paths, and failure modes are part of selection—not a later hardening phase.
Runtime, network, device, data, and workload behavior are assessed against explicit experience and operating budgets.
We weigh platform maturity, interoperability, talent availability, support paths, and the cost of future options.
The right choice leaves the organization with a system it can understand, operate, and evolve without hidden dependency on us.
Start with the system
Share what the product must do, what exists today, and what your team needs to own next. We’ll make the technology choices explainable.